Talk:Dialect: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(article checklist; red links)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Dialect
|                cat1 = Linguistics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:59, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
}}


== changed status ==
== changed status ==

Revision as of 09:03, 26 September 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Regional or social variety of a language distinguished by pronunciation, grammar, or vocabulary, especially a variety of speech differing from the standard literary language or speech pattern of the culture in which it exists. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Linguistics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

changed status

I revised cleanup status to No since there are many non-existent links; my understanding is that these should be linked or eliminated as part of cleanup. If that's correct, then there's more cleanup to do here.Pat Palmer 16:43, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

I've changed the status to '4' as this is basically a WP article with little change. John Stephenson 04:59, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
It's OK to have red CZ links; just not red Template: links or things pertaining to Wikipedia. John Stephenson 00:28, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Dialect continuum, duplication of information?

Since there is a separate Dialect_continuum page which is extensive, would it be possible to shorten the section here, which seems to define what a continuum is? It seems to me that there may be considerable duplication of effort here.Pat Palmer 15:12, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

Done; just a couple of examples now. John Stephenson 23:07, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Great!Pat Palmer 05:01, 9 April 2007 (CDT)