Talk:Normal distribution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert Tito m (approval) |
imported>Robert Tito m (→approval) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
it seems this article is approaching approval status, it needs some tweaking but so far it seems ok to me. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:black"> <font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 22:01, 21 April 2007 (CDT) | it seems this article is approaching approval status, it needs some tweaking but so far it seems ok to me. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:black"> <font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 22:01, 21 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
For completeness a small section could be added where physicists and chemists use the normal distribution in interpreting their experimental data as well as the error distribution in the observed quantities. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:black"> <font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 22:04, 21 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:04, 21 April 2007
There are a couple of maths formulae which are not parsing correctly and thus need correcting. --Charles Blackham 14:58, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
- I think I've fixed that now. It appears that Citizendium's version of TeX is not yet as versatile as Wikipedia's. Michael Hardy 21:12, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
approval
it seems this article is approaching approval status, it needs some tweaking but so far it seems ok to me. Robert Tito | Talk 22:01, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
For completeness a small section could be added where physicists and chemists use the normal distribution in interpreting their experimental data as well as the error distribution in the observed quantities. Robert Tito | Talk 22:04, 21 April 2007 (CDT)