Talk:Irish Famine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anton Sweeney
m (Fix abc on article checklist)
imported>Richard Jensen
(coverage)
Line 22: Line 22:


:About to do a copyedit for spelling and grammar.  On a) and b) - at first reading, it looks ok to me.  Sources and references would obviously be good. [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 16:35, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
:About to do a copyedit for spelling and grammar.  On a) and b) - at first reading, it looks ok to me.  Sources and references would obviously be good. [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 16:35, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
== coverage ==
The article is heavy on government responses, but light on the famine itself. I will add more details. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 21:35, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:35, 3 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Irish Famine"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Denis Cavanagh 10:33, 2 September 2007 (CDT); Anton Sweeney 09:46, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I need someone to neutralise this

I think there is some bias in this article which literally poured out of me as I wrote it. The major issues here are:

A) Government economic policy was not favourable to disaster relief - does my wording need changing?

B) The Catholic Churches well documented lack of active relief work - Am I being a bit too harsh here?

There are others as well, so it may need some altering here and there (Never mind several grammer mistakes I'm seeing everywhere) Denis Cavanagh 12:51, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

About to do a copyedit for spelling and grammar. On a) and b) - at first reading, it looks ok to me. Sources and references would obviously be good. Anton Sweeney 16:35, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

coverage

The article is heavy on government responses, but light on the famine itself. I will add more details. Richard Jensen 21:35, 3 September 2007 (CDT)