Talk:The Fools in Town Are on Our Side: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer (Going to read this, I think) |
imported>Hayford Peirce |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== I am interested! == | == I am interested! == | ||
While crime lit. is not usually my thing, there are notable exceptions. I find this description compelling enough that I plan to try and locate this book. Thanks, Hayford![[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 17: | While crime lit. is not usually my thing, there are notable exceptions. I find this description compelling enough that I plan to try and locate this book. Thanks, Hayford! Strange that in decades, I haven't come across Ross Thomas. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 17:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think it's his BEST book, but it's probably his most unusual, and it has all of his characteristics and mannerisms. And it DOES have some fine stuff in it. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] ([[User talk:Hayford Peirce|talk]]) 19:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:28, 26 June 2020
I am interested!
While crime lit. is not usually my thing, there are notable exceptions. I find this description compelling enough that I plan to try and locate this book. Thanks, Hayford! Strange that in decades, I haven't come across Ross Thomas. Pat Palmer (talk) 17:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think it's his BEST book, but it's probably his most unusual, and it has all of his characteristics and mannerisms. And it DOES have some fine stuff in it. Hayford Peirce (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)