Talk:Abrogation doctrine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Frank van Geelkerken
mNo edit summary
imported>Derek Harkness
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Abrogation doctrine
|                cat1 = Law
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 11:58, 26 May 2007 (CDT)
}}
It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian andUS law.
It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian andUS law.
Maybe '''<nowiki>[[Category:Law US]]</nowiki>''' in this case? [[User:Frank van Geelkerken|Frank van Geelkerken]] 11:17, 13 May 2007 (CDT) (added name)
Maybe '''<nowiki>[[Category:Law US]]</nowiki>''' in this case? [[User:Frank van Geelkerken|Frank van Geelkerken]] 11:17, 13 May 2007 (CDT) (added name)
*So far as I have been able to determine, this doctrine is unique to U.S. law, with its clearly delineated state/federal system. I don't know what the criteria is for splitting off categories. Cheers! [[User:Brian Dean Abramson|Brian Dean Abramson]] 20:42, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
*So far as I have been able to determine, this doctrine is unique to U.S. law, with its clearly delineated state/federal system. I don't know what the criteria is for splitting off categories. Cheers! [[User:Brian Dean Abramson|Brian Dean Abramson]] 20:42, 2 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:58, 26 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Abrogation doctrine"
Workgroup category or categories Law Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Derek Harkness 11:58, 26 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.




It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian andUS law. Maybe [[Category:Law US]] in this case? Frank van Geelkerken 11:17, 13 May 2007 (CDT) (added name)

  • So far as I have been able to determine, this doctrine is unique to U.S. law, with its clearly delineated state/federal system. I don't know what the criteria is for splitting off categories. Cheers! Brian Dean Abramson 20:42, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Abrogation_doctrine&oldid=215053"