Talk:Alice Bailey: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>James Davis
No edit summary
imported>James Davis
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Note:  I was the primary author of the Alice Bailey article on Wikipedia.  When I left, I brought the best portions of it here (or rather what the article use to be before non-experts ravaged it.)  The portions I brought here were already substantially different than the rapidly "evolving' version on Wikipedia.  I've done major revisions, reworking, and condensing on the Citizendium version so that the material reflects Baily's main themes together with that of her more reputable critics.  When I last looked, the Wikipedia version was rapidly degenerating and being turned into an article on race and politics, which are significant but proportionately minor threads in Alice Bailey's writings. [[User:James Davis|James Davis]] 13:56, 12 October 2007 (CDT)  
Note:  I was the primary author of the Alice Bailey article on Wikipedia.  When I left, I brought the best portions of it here (or rather what the article use to be before non-experts took over)  The portions I brought here were already substantially different than the rapidly "evolving' version on Wikipedia.  I've done major revisions, reworking, and condensing on the Citizendium version so that the material reflects Baily's main themes together with that of her more reputable critics.  When I last looked, the Wikipedia version was being turned into an unusually critical and unbalanced article on race and politics, which are significant but proportionately minor threads in Alice Bailey's writings. [[User:James Davis|James Davis]] 13:56, 12 October 2007 (CDT)  





Revision as of 14:24, 12 October 2007

Note: I was the primary author of the Alice Bailey article on Wikipedia. When I left, I brought the best portions of it here (or rather what the article use to be before non-experts took over) The portions I brought here were already substantially different than the rapidly "evolving' version on Wikipedia. I've done major revisions, reworking, and condensing on the Citizendium version so that the material reflects Baily's main themes together with that of her more reputable critics. When I last looked, the Wikipedia version was being turned into an unusually critical and unbalanced article on race and politics, which are significant but proportionately minor threads in Alice Bailey's writings. James Davis 13:56, 12 October 2007 (CDT)


Just FYI--my observation is that articles which contain more quotes than substance, or significant quote amounts often come under scrutiny. I'm pretty sure that's what happened to the article on Mien Kampf (it's redlinked now.) --Robert W King 18:34, 11 October 2007 (CDT)

Robert, thanks for your observation. I've followed your implicit suggestion and radically reduced the number of quotations and made the whole article much tighter. James Davis 10:51, 12 October 2007 (CDT)


Article Checklist for "Alice Bailey"
Workgroup category or categories philosophy Workgroup, religion Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by James Davis 14:39, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.