Talk:History of pre-classical economic thought: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Petréa Mitchell
m (Updated checklist to match workgroups in article)
imported>Richard Jensen
(new name needed)
Line 12: Line 12:


This article was moved from [[History of Ancient Economics]] in order to conform to Citizendium [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Policy_Outline#Article_Naming_and_Topic_Choice Naming conventions].  The redirects were protected so they shoud still allow the links.  --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 23:01, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
This article was moved from [[History of Ancient Economics]] in order to conform to Citizendium [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Policy_Outline#Article_Naming_and_Topic_Choice Naming conventions].  The redirects were protected so they shoud still allow the links.  --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 23:01, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
== new name needed ==
this article is about the history of economic thought to 1776, and should say so. There is a proposal to change the [[Economics]] article to [[Economic Thought, History]], where this article would also fit. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 07:47, 21 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 07:47, 21 September 2007


Article Checklist for "History of pre-classical economic thought"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 21:42, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article was moved from History of Ancient Economics in order to conform to Citizendium Naming conventions. The redirects were protected so they shoud still allow the links. --Matt Innis (Talk) 23:01, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

new name needed

this article is about the history of economic thought to 1776, and should say so. There is a proposal to change the Economics article to Economic Thought, History, where this article would also fit. Richard Jensen 07:47, 21 September 2007 (CDT)